The following opinion piece from China Daily, written by Beijing-based commentator Xu Ying, vehemently decries the US’s bombing of Venezuela and the kidnapping of President Nicolás Maduro and his wife Cilia Flores.
It was not an internationally sanctioned action. It was a unilateral act of force against a sovereign state — one that directly violates the United Nations Charter and undermines the most basic norms governing relations between nations.
The author points out:
The prohibition on the use of force is not a marginal rule of international law, it is its cornerstone. Article 2 of the UN Charter leaves no ambiguity: states must refrain from threatening or using force against the territorial integrity or political independence of other states. Only two exceptions exist — self-defence against an armed attack, or authorisation by the UN Security Council. The US’ action against Venezuela satisfies neither.
While the Trump administration has sought to justify its actions on the basis of absurd claims about narcotics trafficking by top Venezuelan officials, the article points out that “international law does not recognise the extraterritorial enforcement of domestic criminal law through military means”.
The US government’s statements about “managing” Venezuela and running its oil industry “strip Venezuelan sovereignty of any real meaning” and “treat a UN member state as an object to be administered rather than as a subject of international law”.
The article concludes by saying that “Governance imposed at gunpoint is no governance at all, and abandoning restraint today risks a world where, tomorrow, no rule, no border and no state will be secure”. The correct approach to international relations is that taken by China:
China advocates a multipolar world where all countries, regardless of size or strength, enjoy equal sovereignty. Upholding international law is not a rhetorical preference, it is a practical necessity for global stability.
On Jan 3, 2026, the United States crossed a line that the postwar international order was explicitly designed to prevent. In a coordinated military operation involving air strikes and special forces, US troops entered Venezuelan territory, forcibly seized the country’s sitting president Nicolás Maduro and his wife Cilia Flores and transferred them to the United States to face domestic criminal charges. Washington subsequently announced its intention to oversee a “transition” in Venezuela and facilitate the entry of US oil companies into the country’s energy sector.
Continue reading International law a casualty in US assault on Venezuela